Thanks for reading today’s review of John Bollinger
John Bollinger is one of the’elder statesman’ of the specialized investigation community. In reality, nearly every single trading platform comes prebuilt with his original work: Bollinger Bands.
I won’t spend over a moment talking about Bollinger Bands. They’ve existed since before the time that Jesus walked on the earth. The Romans probably used a Bollinger Band to predict how long Jesus would survive the cross. The Bollinger Band predicted that Jesus would be a’day trade’. Along with the Bollinger Band was correct! Jesus lasted until roughly the end of the day.
However, the Bollinger Band didn’t predict the resurrection. And that’s the problem with technical evaluation — that the predictive quality is often too fleeting to utilize regularly.
And yet, John Bollinger of Bollinger Bands persists to this day. Peddling the predictive quality of the Bollinger Band via a series of conventions, books, indicator bundles, speaking engagements, and even cash management solutions.
Let’s take a closer look in John Bollinger…
Bollinger Bands: the early days
I have met John Bollinger several times. Typically at the Money Show or the Traders Expo. John is usually the ‘centerpiece’ of the seminar. Folks from far and wide will pile into these seminars to hear this sage financial wizard waylay some sort of financial prediction.
He will usually begin his presentation and speak about his past and how he accidentally stumbled into the financial services industry. It goes something like this…many years ago, back in the 1980’s, John was a just a puppy fresh out of film school with dreams of being the next George Lucas. He landed a job at a hardscrabble financial news network named FNN or Financial News Network. This was a ground floor opportunity.
After a few years of floating in the financial soup of the stocks and commodities markets, he began to develop his own theories as to why markets gyrate from area to area. He came up with a corny little idea that prices tend to move in cycles that push the boundaries of 2 standard deviations from a moving average.
Don’t let the math dazzle your eyes. This is truly simple stuff folks. John certainly has not broken through to some unknown theory of physics. God wasn’t hiding this ‘secret’ from anyone. The truth is that Bollinger Bands have a tendency to comfortably couch prices within a visual envelope. This visual envelope tends to leak into our imagination and beckons the mind into believing that the Bollinger Band predicted the price–when in reality the Bollinger Band is simply shadowing what has already happened.
If any reader swears that Bollinger Bands are the ‘holy grail’ of trading, I suggest that you immediately seek medical attention. Because you are suffering from a psychological disorder named Apophenia. In a nutshell, you are seeing Jesus appear on your toast. You are the owner of a miraculous toaster: The Jesus Toaster.
If you refuse to seek out medical attention, then I suggest that you read an excellent article the was published in Scientific American back in 2008. It talks about Patternicity and how humans are uniquely wired to be fooled by visual stimulus. Patternicity: Finding Meaningful Patterns in Meaningless Noise.
The Bollinger Band Bandwagon
John Bollinger has been riding this Bollinger Band thing for a very long time. He works it. Like a topless dancer on Superbowl weekend. He is the Stormy Daniels of technical analysis. But is any of this real? Or is this just a financial fantasy conjured up by a skilled storyteller? And yes, John is a skilled storyteller.
Does John Bollinger deserve to be coddled by Bloomberg and the CNBC talking heads? Is he really a financial guru? We dug deeper in hopes of answering this question.
Bollinger Capital Management
According to Finra.Org, John Bollinger is a registered money manager with NO COMPLAINTS.
Next, we dug deeper and investigated his disclosure filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The disclosures reveal that John Bollinger and Bollinger Capital Management are in good standing. And have been registered since 2006. You can find a detailed report here.
However, neither Finra, the SEC, or the Bollinger Capital website contains any information regarding investment performance for managed accounts. So we continued to dig.
During the month of April 2018, tradingschools.pro created a fictional character and proceeded to dig for the truth. This fictional character was a phony hair coloring heiress named Lady Beatrice. Yep, I acted like the beneficiary of a company that makes hair coloring for women. I described myself as very rich, and with 5 cats. My primary goal was to invest my phony millions and earn a consistent income. I did my best to impersonate the voice of Lady Beatrice.
I spoke with a lovely person named Dorit Kehr. She clarified that Bollinger Capital is a two-person operation and she handles the important stuff. She clarified that Bollinger Capital currently manages $16 million and charges an yearly fee of 1.5 percent. Doing some quick math, that is $240k annually. Not bad!
She next explained that I needed to open a TD Ameritrade account with a minimum balance of $250k in order to participate. Once the account was opened, then John would log in daily and manage the account, making trades on my behalf.
I next asked for an audited track record of returns. She was more than happy to send me whatever I needed. A short time later, I received a breakdown of returns for Bollinger Capital. Screenshot below:
If you take a closer look at this… it’s not bad. John Bollinger beat the stock market by a few percentage points over a 17-year span. This includes all of his management fee’s subtracted. A lot of readers are probably poo-pooing these returns. However, I would like to remind the audience that according to Ryan Poirier, an analyst for S&P Dow Jones, only about 30% of money managers are actually able to beat the S&P 500.
Yes, John Bollinger deserves to be in the rarified air. He is, in fact, a world-class money manager. Great job John.
However, many readers are probably already griping. Who in the heck has $250k laying around? Not me.
The ‘backdoor’ to John Bollinger’s picks
John Bollinger is not a day trader. He is a position trader. Not an active or frantic trading style. He is very passive. A great option for people looking to simply invest, at least in the traditional sense. But the ‘catch’ is that $250k minimum.
Is there a workaround? Yep.
I next contacted Dorit Kehr using yet another identity. This time, I was a pizza delivery professional. With only about $250 in my pocket. I explained that I desperately needed John’s picks, but my $250 was missing three zeroes. I could hear her sigh over the telephone. She said, “OK, well if you really want to duplicate John’s picks without sending me $250k, then you can just subscribe to John’s picks by paying $39 for his monthly newsletter.
I next explained that $39 was a stretch. She felt sorry for me. And immediately sent me the most current version for free.
I immediately called her back and thanked her for the freebie. And then I kindly asked if I could share it with a few of my friends. She said yes. I am not sure she realizes that about 100k ‘friends’ read this stupid blog each month. Thanks Dorit! The following is a current version of the Bollinger Bands Newsletter:
John Bollinger ‘Secret Sauce’
In truth, I have pulled my little scam on Dorit a few times. Have gotten more than a few free newsletters. She has a soft heart and is the type of person that gives the homeless guy her last dollar for his heroin fix. Sorry Dorit, but its the truth. I have been surfing your liberal tears.
Earlier in this article, I talked about how Bollinger Bands are not very predictive. But this assertion contradicts the verified performance results of John Bollinger. So what gives?
In my opinion, after reading quite a few of the Bollinger Bands Letters, I am convinced that John’s secret is that he uses quite a few different tools to help him make his picks. He references all sorts of technical tools and attempts to apply common sense to his stock picking methodology.
He also mixes in quite a bit of ‘popular culture’ and creates analogies that infuse plain old common sense that coincides with technical indicators. He say’s that he does not rely upon fundamental analysis. But its plain to the reader that popular culture helps to formulate his worldview. I wonder if he even realizes it.
Wrapping things up
Thanks for reading. John Bollinger is certainly not a scammer or a trading con artist. The guy really does trade. And he trades well.
Most importantly, he has the confidence to trade the life savings of his customers. In my opinion, that is a scary proposition. So he deserves a lot of credit.
That’s it for today. Love to read your comments below.